More information : [TQ 75336031] White Horse Stone [NR] (1)
Upper White Horse Stone: This has succeeded the original stone [see TQ 76 SE 12] and inherited its legend. It is mentioned in Beale-Poste's MSS but there is no further information to be gained. (2)
The Successor White Horse Stone is a large upright sarsen standing in the opposite angle of the cross roads to the site of the original stone and it has inherited both the name and tradition of the original, a fact which is not generally recognized. As it stands upright it is very reminiscent of a chamber wall stone. There are many other stones in the vicinity. (3)
Upper White Horse Stone included in list of 'Megalithic Remains, probably Burial Chambers'. (4)
White Horse Stone sometimes Upper White Horse Stone - a large stone, 8ft by 5 ft by 2 ft, with fragments of others nearby, which may be the much ruined remnant of a burial chamber. In list of doubtful sites. (5)
TQ 75356032. The stone measures 3.0m x 1.6m and is 0.7m thick. It stands upright, lengthwise, within a small wood on the line of the Aylesford-Boxley parish boundary. (GP AO/59/6/2 from south east). Antiquity Model Survey has been carried out. (6)
Condition unchanged. (7)
TQ 754604. Aylesford. White Horse Stone, county number 17. (8)
Upper White Horse Stone, TQ 753603. This large upright stone is in anarrow strip of woodland east of the A229. The stone is 2.9m long, 1.65m high and about 60cm thick. Nearby are nine much smaller stones that extend westwards from the stone for about 10m. There is no trace of a mound and it is possible that some of these stones were moved from the adjacent field by farmers. Its identification as another chambered long barrow is therefore uncertain. Early antiquarians thought that it resembled a standing horse, hence its name, but stories of the god-like White Horse of Kent attached to it are quite without foundation. (9,10,11)
Paul Ashbee has in recent years published several articles discussing the Medway Megaliths, with a particular emphasis on historical records and early investigations, with detailed bibliographic references and early illustrations. He notes virtually no reference to the Upper White Horse Stone before 1907, by which time it had already become associated with the various legends previously linked to its destroyed predecessor the Lower White Horse Stone (TQ 76 SE 11), along with other tales. Identification of the stone as part of a Neolithic burial chamber, which Ashbee appears to tentatively support, is highly speculative. (12-15)
The single sarsen slab has long been in use as a boundary marker in an area dense in naturally occurring sarsens. There is no threat to this already scheduled item. (16) |