More information : [Name centred SE 4987 1725] Castle Hill [GS] AO/LP/59/37 shows published 6" detail enlarged to 1/2500. (1) Castle Hill, Wentbridge, Kirk Smeaton, is classed as apromontory fortress. "Certain vesties of an earthwork are to be seen on a projecting bluff on the south side of the River Went and 1 mile east of Wenrbridge. The older maps of the Ordnance Survey show the western portion as inclosed by an oval line of bank, now destroyed, but on the east are two straight detached pieces of rampart, apparently unconnected with the rest of the work. A little to the east of them is an indentation in the cliff, suggestive of the beginning of a ditch". (2) The remains now consist only of a single earth and stone bank, partly denuded and covered by dense vegatation at SE 4995 1725. This is the more southerly of the VCHs 'two straight detached pieces of rampart apparently unconnected with the rest of the work". All the other features shown on the 1853 6" have been destroyed by quarrying. Castle Hill is a spur overlooking the steep sided valley of the River Went, to the north, and a good situation for a promontory fort. The indentation in the cliff, mentioned by authority 1, is a hollow way to a track descending the easiest path down the side of the valley. There are other similar hollows further to the east, and it may not be connected with the earthwork. It is understood, from the Contractor that further quarrying is to take place and threatens the surviving remains. A 25" survey has been made. (3) Survey of 15-7-60 unchanged. (4) The classification as a promontory fort cannot be accepted uncritically, though the virtual destruction of the site makes any positive identification uncertain. The plan on the 1853 6 in. suggests a simple enclosure with a possible annexe, the surviving portion of which is still quite strong on the ground. The plan is not suggestive of a promontory fort, though the remains may be those of a fortified farmstead enclosure, and may be I.A. (5) SE 499176 Castle Hill, Wentbridge, listed by Challis and Harding as a promontory site incorporating a simple enclosure with possible annex. (6)
|